The Effects Of Discrimination That LGBT Persons Encounter


The article selected for this proposal is number two in the UDHR. It deals with the issue of discrimination and prohibits harassing other people (United Nations 6). This problem is compelling to me because I know people who face inequality or prejudices daily.

Current Knowledge

Presently, I know that numerous people cannot live normally because other individuals state that the LGBT community representatives do not deserve happiness. The well-being of lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgenders, and other minorities is threatened. Many of them cannot have equal access to health care and education and freely express their identity in public places.

Future Knowledge

I will need to learn some relevant statistics as well as search recent news articles that would outline some cases involving LGBTQIA+ persons or explain the reasons behind the actions of those who discriminate against them. I will also find information about current successful campaigns that fight discrimination.


The intended audience involves those who are not LGBTQIA+ direct representatives. In other words, those individuals who either discriminate against these people or have a neutral position. They are selected to raise awareness among these two groups and reduce inequalities.

Policy Stock Issues

The significance is that all people have the right to live freely and happily, and LGBT representatives are mainly deprived of this opportunity. The harm is that these individuals will suffer, and more additional issues can occur. The inherency is certain people’s ignorance, cruelty, and non-tolerance.

It is required to study the issue, including its causes, harmful effects, and current state, to then provide effective solutions to end discrimination and harassment of LGBTQIA+ representatives.

Argument Main Points

The proposal will focus primarily on the adverse effects of discrimination that LGBT persons encounter every day. Overall, the main argument will probably be the emphasis on the fact that such individuals never interfere with the lives of other people who do not relate to the LGBT community. Consequently, there is no need to discriminate against gays, lesbians, and other minorities. It is possible to suggest that listing the extremely negative consequences of persistent inequality and harassment will make society more aware and tolerant.

Source Review

An extended number of resources may be valuable for this proposal. The selected sources include a news article, the White House’s statement, the humanitarian website that deals with the identified issue, and a report published by the Center for American Progress. To begin with, it is possible to discuss some statistical information, and a paper by Singh and Durso is quite helpful for this. According to the authors, “1 in 4 LGBT people report experiencing discrimination in 2016,” and the situation is not becoming much better (Singh and Durso). The article provides detailed data, lists unseen harms and vulnerabilities divided into groups, and offers a call to action. Further, the Human Rights Campaign website offers valuable resources for people interested in the issue and promotes equality.

The other two sources are also extremely insightful and relevant to the proposal. From the White House’s statements and the Ohio Capital Journal’s article, it becomes evident that the government supports LGBT people and their rights to happiness and self-expression. Trau states that Ohio lawmakers focus on putting an end to discriminatory policy and want to encourage the community to be more tolerant and inclusive. Therefore, these two sources effectively outline the position of the U.S. authorities.

Rhetorical Precis

All four selected sources are relevant, credible, and supported by evidence. Their content fully refers to the topic of the proposal, offering the necessary information and statistics. Not only the content but also the delivery of the resources is professional and adequate, making navigation easier. All the selected papers argue that discrimination against LGBT people must be eliminated or at least reduced.

Works Cited

Human Rights Campaign. Equality for All, Not for Some, 2022.

Singh, Sejal, and Laura E. Durso. “Widespread Discrimination Continues to Shape LGBT People’s Lives in Both Subtle and Significant Ways.” CAP, 2017. Web.

Trau, Morgan. “Bipartisan Group of Ohio Lawmakers Attempt to Make LGBTQ Discrimination Illegal.” Ohio Capital Journal, 2022.

United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 2015.

The White House. “Fact Sheet: President Biden to Sign Historic Executive Order Advancing LGBTQI Equality During Pride Month.” The White House, 2022.