Responses To Philosophy Questions: 1. Friedrich Nietzsche And The Problem Of Morality And 2. Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Existential Vision (Full Questions Below) Essay Help Site:edu

1. How does Nietzsche propose to deal with the problem of morality? Why is it a “problem” for him? How is Nietzsche’s approach to morality different than that offered in traditional philosophy and theology? Why does Nietzsche question the traditional distinctions between Good and Evil, and Right and Wrong? According to Nietzsche, what is the common assumption shared by these distinctions, and why does he reject that assumption? 2. “And therefore I hasten to return my ticket. And it is my duty, if only as an honest man, to return it as far ahead of time as possible. Which is what I am doing. It’s not that I don’t accept God, Alyosha, I just most respectfully return him the ticket.” Why is Ivan proposing to “return” his ticket to God? Alyosha goes on to accuse his brother of “rebelling” against God. Why is he rebelling? Contrast the figure of Ivan with Zosima. If Ivan is a man of action and impatience. What sort of person is Zosima? In what ways does Zosima reflect Dostoevsky’s own existential vision?

[supanova_question]

Questions #71-72: Short Essay on The Bloody Chamber- select TWO out of the four essay questions below and write a scholarship essay help: scholarship essay help

Questions #71-72: Short Essay on The Bloody Chamber- select TWO out of the four essay questions below and write a well-developed, well-supported essay of approximately two paragraphs for each question. Make sure you support your claims with specific references and examples from the novel either in the form of paraphrases or quotations. Each essay is worth 15 points (30 points total). Option #1: Analyze how humanity is portrayed in one of Carter’s tales. When responding to this question, think about how Carter presents the two worlds (animal vs. human) in “The Tiger’s bride.” What about “The Company of Wolves” or “Wolf Alice?” In each tale, we see a direct contrast between the human and animal world. What important message is she trying to convey through her representation of humanity? Option #2: Choose one-two motifs from one of Carter’s stories and write about its significance. As you may recall, motifs are recurring ideas/features in a story, and some of the motifs we went over were flowers, mirrors, masks, blood, and so on. When you are writing about the significance, think about how these motifs are important to the plot, to the message of the tales, and/or representations of certain characters. Option #3: Analyze the portrayal of the female character in Carter’s stories. Is the female empowered or oppressed and how? Think about the Christmas Rose in “The Tiger’s Bride,” or the girl in “The Erl King.” What about the girl in “The Company of Wolves?” How does Carter’s portrayal of women shine light on their empowerment or oppression? Provide specific details from the texts to prove your point. Option #4: Analyze how the female characters in Carter’s tales are represented as a “commodity.” Provide specific references to the texts as evidence. What about gender politics or stereotypes in our society do you think Carter is trying to critique when illustrating women in this way?

[supanova_question]

Compare three Asian philosophies (Buddhism, Confucianism, and Daoism) on the topic why kittens are adorable. What I mean by Essay online essay help

Compare three Asian philosophies (Buddhism, Confucianism, and Daoism) on the topic why kittens are adorable. What I mean by this is I want you to relate the reason why kittens are adorable according to the specific philosophies. For example: according to Christianity kitten are adorable because God made all creatures. He looked at everything he made and it was good. Therefore Kittens are good and cute. Explain the understanding of why kittens are adorable according to each philosophy.

More instruction and guidelines on this paper are in the document GUIDE TO FINAL PAPER. PLEASE READ THIS DOCUMENT AND WRITE THE PAPER ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES.

I would like the main source for this paper to come from this book link: https://vedicilluminations.com/downloads/Academic General/Kuppermann_Joel_J._-_Classic_Asian_Philosophy__A Guide_to_the_Essential_Texts.pdf
Please read ONLY THESE THREE CHAPTERS: THE DHAMMAPADA, CONFUCIUS, and DAODEJING (TAO TE CHING). to use and CITE in my paper. You may also use the three supplementary readings I attached to write my paper too. They give more information on each philosophy.

Thank you so much! Appreciate you doing this!

[supanova_question]

Contention: ethical considerations related to the study of prehistoric human remains custom essay help: custom essay help

PAPER MUST BE IN APA FORMAT

Below is copied directly from the assignment page:

*start of instruction
In order to better understand human evolution and behavior in the past, archaeologists and biological anthropologists often study the skeletal and cultural remains of prehistoric people. Using an anthropological perspective, students will conduct scholarly research on one of these three famous prehistoric finds: Otzi the Ice Man, Kennewick Man, Tollund Man or other “bog bodies”. After choosing which archaeological find to focus on, students will do research on the topic for their term paper.

The term paper should be 8-10 pages in length (double-spaced, 2000-2500 words) and formatted in the APA style and cite at least three scholarly and relevant books, articles or other academic sources to support their ideas and analysis.

Scholarly sources are defined as primary texts, original archaeological lab reports or peer reviewed articles from academic journals such as Evolutionary Anthropology, Journal of Human Evolution, or American Journal of Physical Anthropology. These scholarly sources can be searched for on the PCC library’s JSTOR data base or google.scholar and should be listed on a separate reference page. Use the Ath 101 Library Tutorial as a guide to researching and selecting appropriate materials.

Student should also demonstrate an ability to accurately and appropriately use scientific methods of inquiry such as the ability to formulate a hypothesis, analyze statistics, archaeological field notes and lab reports or other information gained from archaeological excavation, genetic studies or other research as part of their analysis.

Students should describe and discuss the following topics in their paper:

Define the concept of culture from an anthropological perspective.
Identify and describe the discovery, social context (human and physical environment) and history of the human remains as an individual and as a representative of their prehistoric society and stage of human evolution. (For example, how and why did people’s bodies end up in bogs in Europe? What do examinations of bog bodies reveal about prehistoric European culture?)
Identify and describe the scientific studies (focused on anthropological theories, methods, excavation techniques, genetic studies or other standard methods) that have been conducted to expand our knowledge of the find and what this research has revealed about prehistoric culture
Identify and describe the physical features of the human remains and any “grave goods” or other cultural materials found with it. What can this information tell us about prehistoric social institutions, such as politics, economics, kinship, religion or family organization?
Identify and describe any competing perspectives, theories and other factual evidence related to the skeleton’s physiology, cause of death, ethnicity, social status, subsistence patterns, tools and technology, or any other culturally relevant features and characteristics
Compare this find with other finds of the same culture and era, noting differences and similarities (eg. Tolland Man with other European Bog people, or Kennewick Man with other North American finds)
Identify and describe any legal controversies, ethical issues, or political disputes associated with this find (eg. Kennewick Man was the subject of a legal dispute between scientists and Native American tribes; Otzi was claimed by both Austria and Italy). How do these controversies relate to or reflect cultural structures and systems of power, such as racism, colonialism, or nationalism that influence how archaeological research is conducted or reported? Provide a concrete example to support your view.
Critically reflect on more ways that anthropologists might conduct their research ethically in the future. Do you think that indigenous people should always be included in the excavation and study of prehistoric human remains? Why or why not?
Personally reflect on how your own life is different or similar from prehistoric people. Why is information about human life in the past still valuable to us today? Provide a concrete example.
This paper is worth 50 points and should be submitted to this drop box by the due date. The following criteria will be used to evaluate your papers.

Scoring Criteria:
Exceptional– 5 points: defines and applies anthropological concepts, theories or methods in great detail or shows evidence of original thought; describes the social context with unusual insight or detail, uses 3 or more scholarly and relevant sources and provides 3 or more clear and concrete examples; spells, writes paragraphs and uses grammar correctly 100 percent of the time.
Good–4 points: defines and applies anthropological concepts, theories or methods covered in class; describes the social context, uses at least 2 scholarly or relevant sources and provides at least 2 clear examples; spells, writes paragraphs and uses grammar correctly 80 percent of the time.
Developing–3 points: defines anthropological concepts, theories or methods, partially describes the social context, uses 1 scholarly or relevant source and provides 1 example; spells, writes paragraphs and uses grammar correctly 60 percent of the time.
not satisfactory–1 point: defines anthropological concepts, theories or methods incorrectly, mentions social context, does not use scholarly or relevant sources or examples, spells, writes paragraphs and uses grammar correctly less than 60 percent of the time.
absent–0 points: fails to discuss information asked for in assignment prompt.

The student accurately describes the concept of culture from an anthropological perspective (5 possible points).
The student accurately describes the social context of the discovery, excavation and study of prehistoric human remains (5 possible points)
The student accurately describes different legal, political and ethical considerations related to the discovery, excavation and study of prehistoric human remains and their impact upon individuals, groups or communities. (5 possible points)
The student accurately uses and cites information from scholarly and relevant sources (5 possible points)
The student accurately applies anthropological concepts, theories and methods to describe the discovery, excavation and study of prehistoric human remains (5 possible points)
The student provides appropriate and concrete examples to support their view (5 possible points)
The student accurately conducts a comparative analysis of the cultural meaning and significance of different grave goods associated with prehistoric human remains (5 possible points)
The student accurately describes the impact of legal and political power structures or systems related to the discovery, excavation and study of prehistoric human remains (5 possible points)
The student writes in full sentences, spells accurately and uses correct grammar and formatting (5 possible points)
The student critically or personally reflects on continuing legal and ethical issues related to the discovery, excavation or study of prehistoric human remains or examines ways that indigenous cultures and scientists could work together more cooperatively in the future (5 possible points)
0-34 points: minimal paper that is not clearly written, does not define or apply the concept of culture from an anthropological perspective, is based mostly on personal opinion, inaccurate research or does not identify or describe any of the required topics about the physiological, legal, ethical or cultural issues and characteristics of a prehistoric human skeleton chosen for study, referencing less than three scholarly articles, books or other resources, and does not show any evidence of critical reflection.

35-44 points: satisfactory paper that is clearly and accurately written, defines and applies the concept of culture from an anthropological perspective, identifies and describes most of the required topics on the physiological, legal, ethical and evolutionary or cultural issues and characteristics of a prehistoric human skeleton chosen for study, referencing three to four scholarly articles, books or other resources accurately, and includes evidence of critical reflection.

45-50 points: exceptional paper that is clearly and accurately written, defines culture from an anthropological perspective, and identifies and describes all the required topics thoroughly on the physiological, legal, ethical and evolutionary or cultural issues and characteristics of a prehistoric human chosen for study in an especially thorough and engaging way, referencing more than four scholarly articles, books or other resources accurately.and including evidence of original thought and critical reflection.

Learning Outcomes:
After completing this assignment, students should be able to:

Use relevant sources of information to support their ideas and analysis of prehistoric human remains.
Describe the social context related to the discovery and study of prehistoric human remains.
Describe and reflect on competing legal perspectives, power structures, or ethical issues impacting the study of prehistoric human remains.
Apply biological anthropological concepts, theories or methods to the study of prehistoric human remains.
*end of instruction

NOW: I went ahead and gathered a few studies on the Otzi Ice Man, and if possible that should be the focus of the essay. Here are the sources!
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep18932
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77518-9
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/tzi-the-iceman-what-we-know-30-years-after-his-discovery
https://www.nature.com/articles/471034a

[supanova_question]

Instructions Project Proposal Throughout this course, you will work in each unit to build a project plan that will ultimately become your final deliverable for Unit VIII. Starting in Unit II, you a level english language essay help

Starting in Unit II, you will begin creating components that will cumulatively make up your final project plan. Your professor will grade each component and offer feedback. The feedback can then be used to make any improvements before submitting all components of the final project plan in Unit VIII.
The outline below represents how your final project plan should be organized.
Project Overview (Units II and III)
1.1 Purpose, Scope and Objectives, and Business Case
1.1.1 Scope
1.1.2 Statement of Work (SOW)
1.1.3 Business Case
1.2 Project Deliverables
1.3 Project Organization
1.4 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
1.4.1 Task Description Documentation
1.4.2 Organization Breakdown Structure (OBS)
1.5 Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM)
1.6 Work Authorization
1.7 Work Charter
Risk Assessment (Unit IV)
2.1 Risk Identification
2.2 Assessment of Probability and Consequence (Qualitative)
2.3 Assessment of Probability and Consequence (Quantitative)
2.4 Mitigation Strategies
Quality Management Report (Unit IV)
Project Schedule (Unit V)
4.1 Activity Duration Estimates
4.2 Gantt Chart
4.3 Activity Network
Project Budget (Unit VI)
5.1 Project Resources
5.2 Other Costs
5.3 Cost Estimates
5.4 Time-Phased Budget
Communications Management (Unit VII)
Tracking and Status Updates (Unit VII)
7.1 Tracking Method
7.2 Notification Record
7.3 Control Systems
Project Closeout (Unit VIII)
8.1 Close Cost Accounts
8.2 Lessons Learned
In the assignment for Unit I, you will start the project process by providing the professor with your idea for a project. The professor will provide feedback so that you can adjust your project, as needed, for Unit II.
Take the considerations below into account.
The project’s timeframe should be about two months in duration. In other words, building a hotel would not be considered an appropriate project for this course because it would likely take at least 6 months to build.
The project team should include at least six people from different areas of your chosen organization.
The scope of the project should be neither too simple nor too complicated. An information technology (IT) project that involves replacing the desktops in the customer service department would be too simple because it would likely only involve a couple of employees and one or two tasks. An IT project involving an organization replacing all of their legacy systems across its U.S. operations would likely be too complicated. Find some middle ground, and remember that you will need to break down the tasks and assign responsibilities to team members.
Your project may be initiated from any functional unit (e.g., IT, operations, accounting, customer service, product development, marketing, sales), but be prepared to create your team using employees from multiple functional units.
For this unit’s assignment, include the components listed below in a minimum of a one-page document using proper APA formatting.
Include the title of your project.
Provide a description (abbreviated scope) of the project.
Specify the project timeframe.
Identify those involved in the project.
Once the professor provides you with feedback on your project idea, you can make the needed adjustments for Unit II and begin to develop your project plan.

[supanova_question]