Religion Of The Founding Fathers And The Role Of The First Amendment In The Separation Of The Church And The State Essay A Level English Language Essay Help

Unlike the Puritan Fathers, who established the religious freedom in American in 1639, the Founding Fathers were among the pioneers who managed to fix the place of religion in the United States.

In this respect, Lambert writers, “their bequests were the ideas of separation of church and state and the free exercise of religion extended people to all faith or no faith”1.

Therefore, the Founding Fathers can be regarded the initiators of a religious revolution because they were rejecting the idea of establishing official religion, as well as of making it the organizing principle of church-state relations, as it had been accepted in the majority of the American colonies.

More importantly, the right of individuals to free choice of religion was exposed to the First Amendment of the Constitutions, which has become the guiding principle of regulating political and social relations in the country.

As a result, a resolute transformation from the Puritan Fathers in 1639, who uphold the religion as a foundation of any society, to the Founding Fathers in 1787, who accepted freedom of religion as an inherent component of any individual, was explained by the shifts in the meaning of freedom, especially the change to concept of religious freedom in the history of the United States.

The outlook of the Founding Fathers on religion radically differed from that introduced by the Puritan Fathers. Because they adhered to the ideology of the Enlightenment, they had a strong belief in the people’s ability to understand the most fundamental laws through their reason.

Therefore, the true conception of religion was perceived as something that is not controlled by the church or represented in the Bible. Rather, religion was an expression of free rational inquiry.

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More The creators of the U.S. Constitution aimed to protect their idea of religious freedom by defying the connection between state and church.

The obvious shift in the place of religious freedom became the central question in 1787 because of the diversity pattern that the Founding Father exercised.

The decision to introduce separation between state and religion was largely predetermined by the existing diversity in religious beliefs at the beginning of seventeenth century. In particular, the territories occupied by the British colonists did not belong to common religious systems.

The first two colonies transplanted diverse religious beliefs – that of the Church of England settled in the 1607 in Virginia and the Puritanism in New England. Each colony was free to exercise their faith and determine the role of religion in shaping the social and moral foundations of the colonies.

More importantly, both Virginia and New England gave their religion official status and introduced tax revenues supporting and protecting the Church from heretics and dissenters2.

Because of the suspicion of rivalry on the basis of religious frictions, there was a growing necessity to establish religion in a broader context and provide individuals with the right to choose their own religious affiliation.

While establishing religion as individuals’ superior right, much concern is connected with the religious beliefs of the creators of the U.S. Constitution.

We will write a custom Essay on Religion of the Founding Fathers and the Role of the First Amendment in the Separation of the Church and the State specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The opinion about the faith that the Founding Fathers uphold can be explained from two perspectives. The first one poses Enlightenment as the basic moral foundation whereas the second belief derives from understanding of the American culture and ideology.

In fact, there was no monolithic view that each of the first patriots adhered to. Rather, their religious affiliations were as diverse as their political views. For instance, Thomas Jefferson supported the idea of religious freedom was accompanied with his objection to the power of clergy and its influence on human will.

Specifically, Jefferson proclaimed, “…nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief, but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinion in matters of religion…”3.

Benjamin stated that “there is in all men something like a natural principle which inclines them to devotion or the worship of some unseen power”4.

Although the Founder did not mention God in his religious proclamation, his reference to religious was made to the existence of the Supreme Being. James Madison was also among the supporters of the Constitution that encouraged the natural principles that guided all individuals in their personal choices.

Many of other America’s founders belonged to deism and there were some who practiced neither Christianity nor Deism, including Washington and Adams.

Therefore, the obvious religious discrepancies should be eliminated to build a strong and powerful nation with the human rights at the core of morale and social welfare.

The introduction of the First Amendment was a step forward toward the nationalization of individuals’ freedom of exercising various religions.

Not sure if you can write a paper on Religion of the Founding Fathers and the Role of the First Amendment in the Separation of the Church and the State by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Therefore, the U.S. Constitution encouraged the religious freedom through establishing separation between state and church. Before the adoption, each citizen of the country were required to enter the Church membership, despite their personal attitudes and views on religion.

Further debates on the issues led to the ideological struggle between various religious schools and, as a result, American society experienced political and social instability5.

Therefore, the adoption of the First Amendment marked the change in perceiving the concept of separation of church and state because it was closely associated with the religious freedom of individuals in the United States.

The religious freedom introduced by Thomas Jefferson and the Constitution is often represented through the concept of separation6.

In fact, the Constitutional phrase has triggered the disturbances among the American citizens who understood it as freedom of the religious institutions from the influence of the political and civil power.

In a broader context, the religious freedom mentioned in the First Amendment represents “a freedom from laws instituting, supporting, or otherwise establishing religion”7.

Jefferson often referred to this law a wall between church and state government. Hence, separation between church and state was understood as something more than disestablishment of relations between religion and political power. Rather, it was often considered as segregation, a distance of contact between these two institutions.

Although, the fact of separation was not proclaimed literarily in the Constitution, this concept has acquired official recognition of the Jefferson’s statement.

Specifically, the concept was widely used by Roger Williams in 1802, who gave constitutional significance concerning separation, President Grant in 1878, and Justice Black in 1947, whose opinion in the case made Jefferson’s idea of separation the basis of further development of jurisprudence.

Jefferson’s metaphor ‘wall of separation’ was cited in many legal cases to define the exact relations between state and religion. Despite various views on the emergence of the separation between religious and governmental institutions, the actual wall between those appeared.

On the one hand, separation could be understood as an attempt of dissenters to focus on the civil rights of individuals irrespective of their religious beliefs. Such an opposition was often perceived as a desire of the dissenters to take control of the ministers.

On the other hand, the supporters of religious freedom did not seek to disconnect church and state. In fact, the dissenters advocated their utmost goals to establish equality among the individuals in terms of religious preferences, which should not affect their attitude to political and social views on the government.

There is apparent evidence that most of the Founding Fathers criticized the clergy and promulgated the independence of the government from the power and pressure imposed by high social layers of population.

They used religious as a powerful tool in controlling people and establishing moral principles that each citizen should observe. Therefore, separation of religion from social institutions was an attempt to liberate people from pressure and protect them from involuntary affiliation to religion.

In conclusion, the Founding Fathers belonged to various religious wings and supported various Churches. Because of the diverse patterns and attitudes, they faced serious challenges because religious influenced emergence of conflicts in political sphere.

In order to eliminate friction, they considered it reasonable to introduce the concept of religious freedom and change the outlooks on religion as a tool of controlling human consciousness. Introducing the First Amendment to the U.S.

Constitution allowed the America’s founders to establish equality among the individuals and prioritize the human right to choose religion irrespective of their political affiliations.

Religion, therefore, has become an inherent right of each individual to choose, which gave rise to the concept of separation of church and state.

References Conwa, J. R. (2008) A Look at the First Amendment: Freedom of Speech and Religion. US: Enslow Publishers.

Hamburger, P. (2004) Separation of Church and State. US: Harvard University Press.

Lambert, F. (2006). The Founding Fathers and the Place of Religion in America. US: Princeton University Press.

Mapp, A. J. (2005). The Faith of Our Fathers: What America’s Founders Really Believed. US: Rowman


The Article “Against Gay Marriage” by William J. Bennett Essay argumentative essay help

Table of Contents Introduction





Introduction The article ‘Against gay marriage’ was written by William J. Bennett. He has served in various leadership positions including a position as chairperson of the National Endowment for the humanities. He has produced various write-ups concerning cultural issues in America.

These include books and articles. His thesis is that gay marriage should not be legalized. The legalization of gay marriage in any society leads to social damage and the destruction of the normal structure of the family.

Summary Bennett has (for a long time) been involved in the forefront in the fighting of same-sex marriages in the United States.

He argues that it is a social issue that may be detrimental to the values held in the society. He was disturbed because the Hawaii Supreme Court was considering legalizing same-sex marriage.

He argued that if Hawaii were to make gay marriages legal, many nations would embrace it too. Bennett terms the arguments made in favor of gay marriages as shrewd arguments (Bennett, 2005, p.409).

These arguments try to suggest that legalization may prove helpful to many in the society.

Bennett shows his concern about the value of marriage, given that gay marriages are legalized. He goes ahead to warn the audience not to take the step.

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More He argues that the marriage institution is fragile already and legalizing same-sex marriage would only make things worse. He continues to mention that all religions only support marriage between a man and a woman and he believes that this is not mere coincidence.

Bennett criticizes the work by Sullivan saying that his argument is baseless as he describes marriage (same-sex marriage) as an open contract where the single, moralistic model is not honored.

Bennett believes that the essence of marriage is faithfulness and some things such as adultery are not encouraged. This is unlike in gay marriages where they are encouraged to explore (Bennett, 2005, p. 410).

The author is against gay marriage due to the implications it may have on the younger generation (Bennett, 2005, p. 410). He argues that those born in such a society would be confused due to the existence of both homosexuality and heterosexuality.

To make things worse some believe that it is a cool thing to be gay and Bennett refers this as ‘sexual identity crisis’. Bennett argues that if gay marriage were to be legalized, several changes would occur including in the education system.

Students will need to be taught about gay marriage and made to understand that one could have two mothers or fathers.

In conclusion, Bennett argues that the marriage institution has suffered enough due to several issues and there is no need for making things worse by introducing same-sex marriage (Bennett, 2005, p. 411).

We will write a custom Essay on The Article “Against Gay Marriage” by William J. Bennett specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Evaluation The information provided by Bennett accurate and logical. He argues that Sullivan supports gay marriage and yet the practices in such marriages do not follow the principles in marriage (faithfulness and fidelity).

He also argues that if all religions believe that marriage is meant to be between a man and a woman, then his argument is true.

He provides arguments in a clear and logical manner in such a way as to convince the reader of the ills associated with same-sex marriage. I agree with Bennett that gay marriages are unhealthy to the society.

Conclusion Same-sex marriage is becoming a trend in the developed world and it is corrupting the norms and values in the society (Laycock, Picarello,


Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Research Paper best essay help: best essay help

Table of Contents Introduction



Whom It Affects

Psychological Problems and Treatment



Introduction The following is a discussion on the posttraumatic stress disorder, a mental condition that comes after an individual experiences traumatic circumstance.

This essay looks into the history, the symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, and the individuals who are likely to suffer from this condition, psychological problems associated with this condition and the treatment of the disorder.

History The posttraumatic stress disorder is an extreme anxiety condition that develops because of exposure to psychological trauma. It is an enduring stress reaction. This condition was first identified in the sixth century and has been associated with soldiers.

In the nineteenth century, medical professionals working with the military noted that military officers in the front lines usually had exhaustion after battle. This was characterized by an extreme fatigue and mental shutdown (Kelleher, 2008).

The terminology used for reference at first was that of gross stress reaction but after the world war two and the Vietnam War other terms were used to explain the disorder.

However, as time evolved and diagnosis of this condition in non-military individuals exposed to trauma was observed medical professionals referred the condition as posttraumatic stress disorder (Fullerton, 2004).

Symptoms The following are some of the symptoms that people diagnosed with the condition experience. The first one is that the victims experience a recurrent of the trauma. They usually have trouble-some memories of the experience when they sleep or nightmares.

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More During the day, the individual may daydream or experience flashbacks of the traumatic event. The condition becomes posttraumatic stress disorder when it persists for a period of more than one month (Kelleher, 2008).

Excessive phobia of events or places associated with the traumatic experience also characterizes the condition. This involves avoidance to places, people, and things that remind the sufferer of the experience.

The third symptom involves having sleeping problems where the individual is unable to sleep. The sufferer also experiences very poor memory and low concentration as the mind is always disturbed.

The individuals suffering from this condition are usually absentminded most of the times and they display high sensitivity to touch or when startled.

They are also extremely watchful to threats. The individual suffering from the posttraumatic stress disorder gets angry quickly. They may have impulsive emotions especially when angry and they may be extremely aggressive (Fullerton, 2004).

The fourth symptom is adehonia; this is an extreme disinterest in what a person previously enjoyed. When one is suffering from this disorder, one becomes extremely reserved, and avoids people.

The victims also fail to make any future or long-term plan as they live in fear and anxiety that they might not live tomorrow. This condition is further associated with feelings of hopelessness, a general dislike for life and suicidal thoughts (Yehuda, 2001).

We will write a custom Research Paper on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Whom It Affects The groups of people affected by this disorder are individuals who have experienced traumatic events in their childhood or adult hood. These may involve physical, emotional or sexual abuse.

The second group of people who experience the traumatic disorders may include employees who work in occupations related to war or violence. This mostly includes soldiers and relief or emergency workers in battle zones (Fullerton, 2004).

People or patients diagnosed with the chronic or terminal illness may also experience the condition. People who have suffered from accidents or witnessed their loved ones in physical injuries are also likely to suffer from this condition. The other predisposing factor of this condition is genetic.

There are individuals who have high arousal tendency and adrenaline surges than others because of their genetic makeup (Fullerton, 2004). Such individuals have a higher likelihood of suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder.

Children from foster families or under foster care are likely or have a higher tendency or likelihood to suffer from this condition mainly because they may be exposed to physical abuse or bitter memories, which separated them from their parents (Kelleher, 2008).

Psychological Problems and Treatment The first psychological problem experienced by people who are suffering from posttraumatic stress is that of having a re-experience of the traumatic event. The thought of seeing a psychiatrist usually never appears safe and many of the patients fear stigmatization especially the soldiers.

The first step towards treatment of this psychological disorder is by educating the patient on what they are suffering from.

This involves having a one on one session where the therapist can inform them of the disorder and other patients who have suffered from the same condition and recovered to make them come to terms with the condition and to stop them from living in denial.

Not sure if you can write a paper on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The second treatment is engaging the patient with a psychotherapist. The psychotherapy session is an interview where the therapist asks the patient questions and explanations about what they have experienced.

This helps the therapist to have a structured memory of the traumatic event. It also helps the patient to have a sense of relief by talking about the traumatic experience.

The other treatment involves having targeted interventions. These interventions also refer to the cognitive behavior therapy. It is training the mind to accept those experiences and teaching it to cope with such traumatic memories by helping the individual to overcome avoidance.

These psychological procedures are directed to assist the individual to stop avoidance behaviors. It involves helping the individual to identify the thoughts or the stimuli that makes them afraid. It also involves training the individuals to replace the distressing thoughts with less distressing thoughts (Kelleher 2008).

By exposing the individual to stimuli that triggers the memory of those events, the individual learns how to cope with thoughts of fear and anger.

This psychological procedure involves the individuals, for example war survivors or soldiers, watching a video on war together with a therapist who guides them on how to react to certain incidences that they are uncomfortable or nervous about.

This helps the patients to come to terms with the traumatic event and enables them to do away with avoidance tendencies (Yehuda, 2001).

The other therapy is the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing. It involves having the therapist assisting the patient to talk about the traumatic event while the patient is looking at the therapist’s rapidly moving finger (Kelleher, 2008).

This therapy is especially helpful to patients who are experiencing low concentration and lapse in memory because of the posttraumatic stress disorder. It helps the patients to regain their concentration and alertness especially if they have been experiencing daydreams.

Although some researchers dispute this mode of treatment, it has nevertheless been effective in PTSD recovery (Kelleher, 2008).

The other psychological treatment of the posttraumatic stress disorder is the interpersonal therapy. The interpersonal psychotherapy involves having the patients in support groups such as family support groups that assist the patient to share the traumatic experience (Kelleher, 2008).

The support groups also link the patients with other patients and people who have recovered from the condition. Such support helps the patients to accept their condition and to realize that it is treatable and one can recover from the condition after the treatment (Yehuda, 2001).

Other than having the psychological procedural treatment, patients suffering from the posttraumatic stress condition can recover by having medical assistance. The victims may be given particular drugs to deal with loss of sleep and hypersensitivity.

The drugs include antidepressants such as fluexetine and paroxetine (Kelleher, 2008). Other forms of drugs include adrenergic antagonists that aim at reducing hyper-arousal in the patients by containing the adrenaline and nightmare experiences.

These drugs are effective when administered for a period of more than one year. The other drugs usually administered in the treatment of the posttraumatic disorder are the mood stabilizers that help the patient to be calm; they also significantly reduce sleep disturbances (Yehuda, 2001).

Conclusion The posttraumatic stress disorder is a condition, which has troubled many people but has not received due attention especially in the treatment of non-war patients. As a result, it leads to mental illness if it is not addressed early enough.

An individual suffering from this condition especially the soldiers must stop fearing stigma and seek treatment before this condition worsens. There are different medical procedures for this disorder and they differ because different patients experience the symptoms differently.

However, for the practitioner to diagnose or to consider the individual exhibiting such symptoms as suffering from the posttraumatic stress disorder, the individual must have experienced the symptoms for one month.

The posttraumatic disorder has treatments that are both psychological and medical. Applying both psychological and medical procedures to deal with the condition is necessary for the treatment procedures to have the desired outcome.

References Fullerton, C. (2004). Acute stress disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depression in disaster or rescue workers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 11, 1370-1376.

Kelleher, I. (2008). Associations between childhood traumas, bullying, and psychotic symptoms among a school-based adolescent sample. Britain’s Journal of Psychiatry, 5, 378-382.

Yehuda, R. (2001). Biology of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 7, 41-46.


Reading Analysis for Ethics Class Essay college essay help near me

Ethics has a significant role in the public service. Personalities need to emulate and practice proper ethics. Particularly, this relates to those serving in public administrative dockets. Adams and Balfour, (2009), emphasize the need to maintain the society in an ethical state.

The two authors propose two basic approaches that may help in preventing the humanity from ethically “coming apart at the seams.” The present changes within the American society are noted.

The sociopolitical and economic factors have increasingly transformed within the U.S. Consequently, these have impacted on the state of ethics within the public service.

The interconnection between liberalism and individual ethics is obvious. The authors examine the American society from the period of the historical revolution. The ability of liberalism to impose phenomenal ethical challenges within humanity is also indicated.

Authority must be exercised in a manner that motivates controlled freedom. However, the effects of globalization on the morality of the society require great precaution (Adams


Expanding Protection of the Great Bear Case Study a level english language essay help: a level english language essay help

The Great Bear rainforest falls under the forest classification of coastal temperate rain forests, which is one type of the most endangered types of forests across the globe; before the threat of logging and other human activities threatening their existence, they covered 1/5 of 1% of the earth’s land surface.

Approximately, 60% of the original coverage of these forests, have been destroyed through development and logging among other human activities. The Great Bear rainforest is one ecological center, which provides an unforgettable adventure site, where there are mountains, waterfalls, coastal and water slide scenery.

This paper is a discussion of the recent proposals to expand the protection of the forest and its scenery, which may not be witnessed anywhere else in the world (Raincoast Conservation Society).

Following the threat of the Great Bear forest, which is one of the few remaining but threatened forest type, scientists around the world have raised concerns over the delays facing the implementation of protection agreements, which are supposed to increase the protection of the threatened forest area.

Further, scientists have been in the fore front, insisting that the BC should fasten the protection processes for the forest.

An example of this was the request sent by global rainforest scientists attending the Earth Summit at Rio, pushing for a faster process to implement the protection of the forest (Gracey 1; Reichel 1).

The stakeholders to be affected by the proposed expansion of the protected area of the forest, include the loggers, who earn their income from the logging activities at the forest.

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More The B.C government is another stakeholder, as its leadership to guide the players to take place in the protection and the making of the agreement, rely on its directing.

The players under the B.C government stakeholders group, include the employees at the ministry of forests, land and natural resources, central and local authorities, for example, the provincial authorities who are greatly involved in the proposal.

There are the forest and research scientists group from different nations, who are pushing the completion of the protection agreement and process, as they are interested in fighting for increased protection of the threatened classification of forests.

Oil companies like the Northern Gateway pipeline company is also interested in the progress of the protection, as its enacting will affect its oil drilling and transportation operations.

Other stakeholders include tourists, who will benefit from viewing the threatened scenery after protection (Raincoast Conservation Society; Reichel 1; Gracey 1).

The benefits from the protection of the forest will include the protection of the wildlife and marine species that live at the temperate rain forest surroundings, which may not be found at other places, except at the few threatened areas.

From the protection of the forest, the authorities will realize the protection of the biodiversity at the area, including the rainforest forest plants, the marine and the land species residing at the region, including bears and the threatened vegetation and rare scenery.

We will write a custom Case Study on Expanding Protection of the Great Bear specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More From the implementation, the process will enable the first nation people living at the region, to improve the wellbeing of the community economically, environmentally, and for the general welfare of the people.

Another benefit is the creation of more tourist income avenues, from which the local people and the government can utilize for long-term growth.

The costs to be borne from implementing the protection of the forest include the cost of implementing the agreements and setting up the protection plan for the forest, and the income of the loggers, hunters and other people relying on the resources at the forest; these groups will lose their source of income and employment.

Another cost to be borne from the implementation is the economic potential of the players within the oil industry, as they will not be able to access the oil reserves at the area, which can form a great source of income and employment locally and nationally (Raincoast Conservation Society; Reichel 1; Gracey 1).

Works Cited Gracey, Kyle. “Scientists around the world concerned over lengthy delays to fully implement the protection agreements in the Great Bear Rainforest.” Canada Newswire, 2012. Web.

Raincoast Conservation Society. Great Bear Rainforest. British Columbia, 2012. Web.

Reichel, Justina. “Scientists Urge BC to Speed up Protection of Iconic Rainforest: Half of Great Bear Rainforest remains open to logging.” The Epoch Times, 2012. Web.


Ethical Scenario in Kant’s Theory of Humanity Essay college admission essay help: college admission essay help

While trying to explain humanity, Immanuel Kant stated that we should always treat humanity in us or in other people as an end and not as a means (Barbara 2011). This is actually the argument which I believe is strongest.

The moral principle behind this argument is helping other people and at the same time helping you. This principle is normally known as beneficence. Treating an individual and yourself as an end depicts that you respect and value that person’s humanity and your humanity too.

This is how you can know that this premise is good. It is important to treat people equally and not discrimination on others because they are disabled or come from different ethnic group or race. Based on utilitarianism theory, an action is termed good if it generates good in a greater way and number (Wells


Medical Ethics: “Sicko” Documentary by Michael Moore Essay (Movie Review) college admission essay help

I believe Michael Moore’s approach to the health care issue in his documentary, Sicko, is elusive and reactive rather than proactive.

It is argued in the documentary that over fifty million Americans are to insure their lives whereas the large percentage insure is unable to maintain its insurance costs owing to rules and regulations and company fraud.

Several interviews were conducted to ascertain the truth of the matter and it was found out that insurance companies play rackets with the lives of people in case of medical emergencies. The insurance companies would always find a reason not to compensate its policyholders.

This is usually aimed at maximizing the profits of the company. The movie compares the healthcare laws of Canada with those of the US. The actor singles out the efforts of one of the Canadian policy maker by the name Tommy Douglas, who worked tirelessly to improve the healthcare system in Canada (Callenbach, 2008).

The actor argues that anti-health care policy individuals claim that providing free healthcare services amounts to communism, which is not true. The then head of state, Ronald Reagan, advised people that universal healthcare services would lead to the loss of freedom and introduction of socialism into the financial system.

Moore answers the critics basing their arguments to Reagan’s allegations that American financial system had not been converted to socialism by the free police services, fire services and the postal services.

In my view, Moore employs both Kantian approach and virtue ethics approach. However, utilitarianism is not applied anywhere in the movie. As Kant observed, each individual in the world exists as an end in himself but not as a means to a particular end.

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More In everything that an individual undertakes in the world, it must be viewed as an end not a means to an end. People do not exist as a means to achieve particular tasks. In other words, we need to strive to achieve our own pleasure but not to exist to please something else.

Critics of the healthcare bill believed that people exist to fulfill the wishes and interests of capitalism, which, according to Kant, is unacceptable since we should not attempt to fulfill the wishes of something else and forget ourselves.

In this regard, we need to act as rational beings meaning that we need to apply reason in everything we do. Healthcare is a basic right to every American hence supporting it is rational and reasonable (DeGrazia, Mappes,


Daoism college essay help: college essay help

Explore the Daoist concept of wu wei. Provide an example from your own life that illustrates this principle.

Explain why Confucius thought education was so important. How do these ideas match with your beliefs on education? Explore the relationship between education and a healthy society.

* All blog original posts must be at least 200 words.
* Each blog original post should be unique and contain relevant videos, images, and article links.
* Students must respond to at least two other blog posts.


The Impact of Applied and Behaviourist Psychology on the Field Essay essay help free

James Rowland Angell’s opinion, in as far as the disappearance of the term ‘consciousness’ from psychology is concerned, was based on his studies in psychology as a critical part of mental activity towards different stimulus in the environment (Hergenhahn, 2009).

His principles in psychology were inclined towards a biological understanding, which rarely tolerated elements that were not physically evidenced such as consciousness.

He identified that by evaluating mental operations as a part of evolutionary stimulus series, psychologists manipulated the different psychological positions of their patients or study subjects in a better way. This was mainly by altering the environmental stimulus that they were meant to adapt to.

He identified that consciousness or lack of it did not inhibit the normal functioning of the ordinary mental processes (Haines