Importantly for our reading and analysis of American Born Chinese, McCloud provides a definition for comics: “Juxtaposed pictorial and other images in deliberate sequence, intended to convey information and/or to produce an aesthetic response in the viewer” (9).
With all this in mind, and using specific examples from the book (citing text as well as describing the other elements of the comic), write a response to the following (in an approximately 250-word response):
Choose two pages (or page spreads) from American Born Chinese and analyze the effect of Yang’s panel construction on reader interpretation of the narrative. (Take a look at page 8 and pages 12-13 in McCloud’s book for examples of unusual page/panel format.)
Pages 24-25 in Scott McCloud’s book “Understanding Comics” should sound somewhat familiar to you, even if the form being spoken about is different; think back to the excerpt from Terry Eagleton’s book How to Read Literature. In all types of literature, our interpretations must start with and never completely depart from our close reading of the black marks on the page (and, in this case, the pictorial and other images!)—the transaction between text and reader.
So, Magritte’s painting “The Treachery of Images” shows a pipe with the (translated) text, “This is not a pipe.” Of course it’s not! we read the author’s words (the black marks on the page) and our minds interpret them. In McCloud’s example, not only is Magritte’s painting “not a pipe,” the painting has been drawn by McCloud to represent the original, then reproduced for the printing of the book, then printed for publication… so it’s not only not a pipe—it’s at least four steps removed from being a pipe!
Part of the material covered in the course comes from recently published academic papers. One of the objectives of writing essay help: writing essay help
Part of the material covered in the course comes from recently published academic papers. One of the objectives of this course is to introduce you to how economic knowledge is created and distributed (research). To encourage you to read these papers, you will write 4 summaries of any articles discussed during class lectures. These will be no longer than 3 pages in length (12 point font). In the summary you will (1) identify the author’s main research question, (2) describe the data sources they use, (3) explain the methodology used to answer the question, (4) discuss the major results, and (5) describe a related extension question for further research. Summaries will be graded on a five-point scale, one point for successfully answering each question. I will provide a good example of one by the end of the first week.
*There will have a bit of reading and listen 3mins music in order to finish this work. (You will essay help online
*There will have a bit of reading and listen 3mins music in order to finish this work. (You will find the Music link in the Important reading material)And (Reading material is PDF provided name–Music A Very Short Instruction)
***Instruction: (Quotations needed!) In your post, refer to at least three different points and/or examples used by Cook about musical notation from( **pp. 51-63) and explain how they apply to our attempt to understand what Moreschi’s performance tells us about his broader culture.
Now that you’ve listened to Moreschi’s performance with Cook’s analysis of the limits of musical notation in mind, it’s time to capture your understanding in writing. In your post, explain how Cook’s analysis of the limits of musical notation should apply to our understanding of Moreschi’s performance. We have only very limited audio recordings of Moreschi. This means we have some information that, according to Cook, musical notation (i.e. written music) can not give us. However, since we only have very few recordings, there’s lots we don’t know about Moreschi as well.
How are the limits of musical notation similar to and different than what we can and can’t know about Moreschi’s ‘sound,’ about the aesthetic ideal expressed in his performance? An ‘aesthetic ideal’ in this context means the framework of values that, in Moreschi’s day, govern what counts as beautiful music, ugly music, fine or high-class music, coarse or low-class music, and so on. ***
Please read my material and instruction carefully in order to help me gain a good grade from you guys. If you can’t be able to see the material that I upload, please let me know immediately, there will not accept any other outside resource! Thank you~
Examine features associated with the concept of civilization that were present in Mesoamerica (Mayas and Teotihuacán), relate elements of Essay best college essay help: best college essay help
Examine features associated with the concept of civilization that were present in Mesoamerica (Mayas and Teotihuacán), relate elements of change and continuity. Be sure to identify those distinct features associated with civilization and focus on ideas of continuity and change.
Length: 750 words maximum, 700 words minimum! (three typed pages, double-spaced)
Write a thesis statement (central argument) in your introduction, then develop your thesis and provide historical evidence (body of your essay), and end with a closing paragraph.
Cite all quotations and paraphrases. Writing is NOT a series of continuous quotations. Make it clear to the reader that you read the text carefully.
For citations and references, use Chicago Manual of Style. All citations are from the same book, so the only thing that will vary is the page number from which you take any quotations from:
 Robert W. Strayer and Eric W. Nelson, Ways of the World: a Brief Global History with Sources, Fourth Edition (Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2016), [Insert page number here].
 Ibid., [insert page number here]. <–This is for when using the same source, but a different page.
Also attached is a condensed version of the topic — a series of bullet points summarizing characteristics of Mayas and Teotihuacan that might help.
I need to submit the paper before 11:59 pm on the 15th of October.
Evaluate the Discussion Section – include the support from the article for your answers. 1-Does the discussion clearly address scholarship essay help
Evaluate the Discussion Section – include the support from the article for your answers.
1-Does the discussion clearly address the objectives and hypotheses?
2-Check the interpretation against the results. Does the discussion merely repeat the results?
3-Do the authors attempt to contextualize non-significant data in an attempt to portray significance? (e.g. talking about findings which trend towards significance as if they were significant).
4-Does the interpretation arise logically from the data or is it too far-fetched?
5-Have the faults, ﬂaws, or shortcomings of the research been addressed?
6-Is the interpretation supported by other research cited in the study?
7-Does the study consider key studies in the ﬁeld?
8-What is the significance of the research? Do the authors mention wider implications of the findings?
9-Is there a section on recommendations for future research? Are there other research possibilities or directions suggested?
(number each answer to match the question)