Use materials available in the course and follow the format provided in the PUBH 585 Assignment Guide to complete this assignment under the details of expectations for Module 3 Summary, Background, and Original Data content.
The Qualitative sections include a statement of purpose, definition of the type of qualitative study you are proposing to conduct, and a definition of study methods. For each of the two research questions (RQ2 and 3), you will want to state the exact research question you will want to answer as well as the demographic and open-ended questions you will want to ask participants in order to answer the overarching research questions to fulfill the purpose of your study. The Methods section then describes in detail how you identify your population and select your participants for interviewing. Finally, you will want to state the expected codes and themes of your findings. These will likely be based on the readings presented in the background. Each part of the Qualitative section will have an explanation of value to towards the research study purpose and answering RQ2 and RQ3.
Dataset 1: The proposed quantitative study will utilize the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Hurricane Center and Central Pacific Hurricane Center: NHC Data Archive to obtain a dataset on hurricanes from July 1920 – November 2020. The variable used is the frequency of hurricanes in New Orleans, LA. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/ (Links to an external site.)
Dataset 2: The proposed quantitative study will utilize the United States Census Bureau, Data from the 2020 Census to obtain the amount of people with hearing loss by zip code in New Orleans, LA. The variable used is hearing loss in both ears. https://www.census.gov/data.html (Links to an external site.)
From an analysis of these two datasets the research question 1 (RQ1), “What is the potential for people with hearing loss in both ears living in New Orleans, to be impacted by a hurricane in the next 10 years?” can be answered.
By answering RQ1, you will be able to statistically state the benefits of your grant proposal and completing the qualitative research you are proposing in Module 4.
Place yourself in the role of an employee named Tyler Cahill, whose annual evaluation has just been completed. As writing essay help
Place yourself in the role of an employee named Tyler Cahill, whose annual evaluation has just been completed. As you review the annual performance evaluation, you believe that it was partly based on judgment and not evidence. However, you realize there are some gaps in your performance. Up to this point, you felt like you had a good working relationship with your manager.
For your initial post, answer the following questions based on the Annual Performance Evaluation document.
What are some examples in the performance evaluation document that are based on judgment and not evidence? In a forthcoming meeting with your manager, what is your plan to address that you believe part of the evaluation was not based on evidence? How will you explain to your manager why it is important for a manager and employee to agree on performance gaps based on evidence?
42 about gene editing and enhancing. See PDF for more details. college essay help: college essay help
#42. Do you agree with the idea that we should morally enhance human beings by increasing or decreasing specific psychological traits? If you can, explain why you do or do not agree with any of Julian Savulescu’s arguments on the topic.
Other instructions and the topic is in the PDF.
Sources to use are in the PDF. Use only sources from the PDF.
Create a procurement schedule for a project from a buy-out log as reviewed in class. ■You will have a procurement online essay help
Create a procurement schedule for a project from a buy-out log as reviewed in class. ■You will have a procurement path for the 30 subs/ scopes shown (ignore final cleaning) –The schedule file will be ready for you to input procurement activities. –A list of lead-times will be provided (note equipment lead times for MEP do not affect undergound timeframes typically) –Submission should be printed as a .pdf in 11×17, with the correct file naming format. –The last procurement activity per sequence should be linked to the installation activity located in the schedule. ■Procurement Schedule Assumptions: –No more than 1 subcontract can be executed in a day (figure no more than 3-4 per week and you cannot stack too many review activities on top of each other. For example, it is not realistic that the A/E can review a bunch of submittals at the same time, or that you can process them for that matter ) –Subs will need 2-4 weeks to create submittals, depending on how involved they are, if they need calcs, involved drawings like steel, etc. –The minimum review timeframe by the designers is 2 weeks. Allow up to 4 week for steel shop drawings reviews or any other really involved. ■The activity string should be as follows: –Sub award –Submittal Creation –Submission to A/E –Submittal review by A/E –Release submittal –Field measure – if needed –Fabrication and delivery –Connection to appropriate installation activity Base schudule file: Procurement Schedule Assignment Base File
Constructing an Intervention Strategy Describe one (1) thing you would like to change in your work community if you could? essay help online free: essay help online free
Constructing an Intervention Strategy Describe one (1) thing you would like to change in your work community if you could? Be sure to explain what it is, why you would like to make this change and what impact this change could have on your workplace at large. Construct an intervention strategy that will assist you in improving this problem by integrating three (3) of the nine (9) points on structuring activities on pp. 146-147. a) Describe the activity b) Explain why and how you think this activity will create change c) Make sure you focus on your topic of change and your work community. Length: 2-3 pages, not including your cover page and reference page Submission Instructions: The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling. The paper should be formatted per current APA and 2-3 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. . . . . . . . . . . . . Part 2 icon Team Intervention Questions Based on your comprehension of concept of team intervention, describe in 2-3 pages how you would create an effective team to improve the problem you identified in Assignment One. Include in your description: a. How your team would differ from a high-performance team. b. The roles you would assign to your team. c. The type of team intervention method you would choose and why. Submission Instructions: The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling. The paper should be formatted per current APA and 2-3 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
This is a response assignment to a letter that is in the link below. The instructions from the instructor a level english language essay help: a level english language essay help
This is a response assignment to a letter that is in the link below. The instructions from the instructor are below:
Write a response to https://www.csuchico.edu/iege/_assets/documents/susi-letter-from-birmingham-jail.pdf
In this letter Dr. King is responding to a some of the criticisms directed toward the protests he led in Birmingham, Alabama. Because Dr. King was a skilled rhetorician and responding to specific criticisms, this letter contains several examples if well-executed counterarguments. In your response, identify TWO of these counterarguments.
For each counterargument:
1. Identify the point addressed by the counterargument.
2. Identify the stategy used to make the counterargument.
3. Summarize the the claim made in the counterargument.
4. State which position you agree with and why.
While I would like you to address each of these points in your responses, the content of your posts should still be presented in paragraphs.
The tactics used to make counteraguments are:
Refutation – Show why the original point is wrong. This could be due to the use of erroneous evidence or faulty reasoning.
Assimilation – Show that the two positions being argued are actually the same. The apparent disagreement may be due to different perspectives or the use of poorly defined terms.
Concede and Pivot – Acknowledge that the original argument is correct, but show that the position taken in the counteragument is more important. This may be due to relevance, urgency, or scope, among other considerations.
I HAVE THE SECOND DRAFT COMPLETED. I WILL SEND THAT TO YOU SO YOU CAN WORK BEYOND THE ONE I online essay help
I HAVE THE SECOND DRAFT COMPLETED. I WILL SEND THAT TO YOU SO YOU CAN WORK BEYOND THE ONE I ALREADY HAVE. Your primary focus will be oh how: I need it to be about 5 pages, double spaced! making it clear how the analysis adds to the on-going discussion that than just echoing the conclusions of other work. What unanswered questions are you taking on, what unique information are you bringing to the table, and how are you forcing the reader to reconsider the conclusions of previous work? _____________________ Following the introduction, you will want to provide context drawn from your sources, educating the reader about the previous research that has been completed on your topic and any additional background information needed to understand your analysis. In addition to this critical background, you should conduct an analysis that supports the central claim of your paper. Your paper should be at least 15 pages in length, not including references. All references should be in the appropriate bibliographic style. Your paper should be responsive to edits and suggestions provided by the instructor and your peer reviewer.
People, Interests, Options, Criteria (PIOC) Analysis Overview and Section IV: Communication Strategies essay help: essay help
Prompt: Effective negotiations are designed with four key focus areas in mind: people, interests, options, and criteria (PIOC). Focusing on these four variables assists in reaching a successful negotiation outcome, a key deliverable for this milestone. Refer to Module One for information regarding PIOC. Discussions on possible ZOPA and BATNA agreements should also be reviewed in the completion of this milestone. In addition to submitting a draft of Section III: PIOC Analysis Overview, you will also include Section IV: Communication Strategies of the final project. Section IV asks you to consider the overt and tacit communication strategies that can be used during the negotiations, as well as their benefits and risks. These two sections should be revised, based on instructor feedback, and then submitted as part of your analysis and negotiation coaching recommendations for executive leadership final project, due in Module Ten. Specifically, your milestone submission must address the following critical elements: III. IV. PIOC Analysis Overview A. Formulate appropriate phrasing for the CHRO’s opening remarks that separate the people from the problems. Your phrasing must be based on principled negotiation practices. B. Identify case-specific negotiating positions and rephrase them as interests. In other words, Sharon Slade and Alice Jones’ ZOPA and BATNA positions should be referred to as case-specific negotiating interests. For example, one of Alice Jones’ possible ZOPA positions may be to obtain a 52-week severance package, during which her compensation and benefits continue through the severance period. This can be rephrased as an interest by adding Alice Jones’ rationale for this position: 52 weeks of severance allows for adequate time to find a comparable position as well as time for her family to relocate to a new geographic region. You have the option of using a table to illustrate each position and the appropriate rephrased interest (one row per position-interest). C. Recommend options that can appropriately address the parties’ integrative interests. You will want to use the open, closed, alternative, and leading questions developed in the Module Five assignment to craft an integrative bargaining proposal. Feel free to consider potential creative options that may not be as common. D. Identify objective criteria that can be used to measure distributive elements of the negotiation. Explain the reasoning for your choices. Communication Strategies A. Identify examples of effective overt communication that could be used in this negotiation. Explain the reasoning for your choices. For example, when hearing a proposal from the executive that would be risky from a human resources perspective, how would you respond? Why? B. Identify situations where tacit communication is important to this negotiation. Provide examples of how you might use such communication at upcoming meetings. For example, if you are making an offer to the executive, what non-verbal cues can you provide to let him/her know the offer is final and you would not be open to negotiating further? C. Contrast the benefits and risks of using overt and tacit communication methods with respect to this negotiation. For example, might one particular method be more appropriate than the other? Why? In your submission, you should recommend options that address both parties’ distributive and integrative interests, using both overt and tacit communication prompts that could be used in the negotiation meeting by Sharon Slade. Consider blind spots that Sharon Slade may have (but may not be aware of) and that Alice Jones may know. You will want to refer to our readings on the Johari window that address this issue. Be sure to address these potential blind spots when formulating the negotiating positions that you will recommend to Sharon Slade. Doing this will increase the likelihood of reaching an integrative, win-win negotiation outcome. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a three-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA 6th edition format. You may also submit the milestone as a five- to six-slide PowerPoint deck, not counting the title slide or reference slide, with speaker notes provided on each slide. It should be of professional quality and use APA 6th edition format.
Most decisions are made with analysis, but some are judgment calls not susceptible to analysis due to time or college essay help online
Most decisions are made with analysis, but some are judgment calls not susceptible to analysis due to time or information constraints. Please write about a judgment call you’ve made recently that couldn’t be analyzed. It can be a big or small one, but should focus on a business issue. What was the situation, the alternatives you considered and evaluated, and your decision making process? Be sure to explain why you chose the alternative you did relative to others considered.