Belt And Road Initiative Affect The Economic Development In Southeast Asia College Application Essay Help

Group the Belt and Road Initiative by investment categories such as infrastructure, energy, oil sector, etc. Discuss how the investment is distributed across Southeast Asia Countries. Different pros and cons in different categories. Group in different sectors.

Talks about the benefit associated with different investment category sectors organizing by benefiting whom and how. Benefitting China or the Southeast Asia countries.

Delete things unrelated to Southeast Asia, just focus on Belt and Road Initiative in Southeast Asia. Or using things that happen in other regions in this paper to make a comparison with BRI in Southeast Asia.

Read through everything and make sure that all sources and research focus on Southeast Asia.

Also, need to specify the drawback of the BRI in Southeast Asia.

If BRI is this good for the regional economy, what are still observing opposition or concerns by some countries?

Also, I need you to specify each data in this paper and I will provide the draft to you. There are references you can use. Also, I need two or three graphs illustrating the basic situation of BRI in Southeast China. Such as the graph in the file I provide. Also like the trend of BRI in Southeast Asia, the investment flow. Please use the data from China Global Investment Tracker to make graphs.

I need a thesis argument such as despite the drawbacks, BRI actually benefits Southeast Asia countries in particular sectors or something. Please read the red comment on draft2 and use that to revise this paper.

Combine draft2 and draft2 part2 into one full paper.

Focus on the logic and persuasion of the paper.


Read Mere Christianity, by C.S. Lewis in its entirety and write a 2000-word book review essay about the text. Essay best college essay help: best college essay help

Read Mere Christianity, by C.S. Lewis in its entirety and write a 2000-word book review
essay about the text. You should start with a short, 500-word maximum, summary of the text.
You should then take the reader through each part of the text, analyzing what parts you found
helpful or unhelpful, what parts you agreed with or disagreed with, and what parts you think
were most central for Lewis’s argument. Papers must have an overall thesis that expresses your
final opinion of the book.
Please note that students are not guaranteed all 5 extra credit points just by turning in a
paper. Only an excellent paper can receive the full 5 points. If I am not able to tell that you have
thoughtfully read and engaged with the text, if I suspect you have only read part of the text, or if
I suspect that you have only read a summary of the text, the amount of extra points will be
reduced accordingly, potentially to 0.

This is the link to the PDF of the writing:


Post a brief descriiption of the video you chose. Next, include an example of one or two codes and Essay a level english language essay help

Post a brief descriiption of the video you chose. Next, include an example of one or two codes and provide quotes from your notes or transcriipt to support your example. Finally, explain your reasoning for this coding.

**The video descriiption has already been done. Use the information in the descriiption and watch the video about Battling drug Addiction to input the information in the Excel document under video 2. Make sure you use the attached file Intro to Coding to get a better understanding og how to code.


4. Using the information provided, what should SP’s shares be trading at on the first day of its listing? essay help: essay help

4. Using the information provided, what should SP’s shares be trading at on the first day of its listing?
a. Conduct a DCF analysis.
b. Conduct a comparable companies’ analysis.
c. Would you recommend that Wang invest in SP? If so, at what price and investment horizon?


Case of a woman suspected disorders: – obsessive compulsive personality disorder – generalized anxiety disorder – social anxiety disorder college admissions essay help

GRADING RUBRIC 1. Summary and conceptualization (25 points) a. (10 pts) Summarizes patient’s presenting concerns, symptoms, and current functioning in a comprehensive, accurate, and organized manner. b. (15 pts) Explains patient’s current symptom profile from a biopsychosocial framework of psychopathology by integrate patients’ personal history, family history, and other individual differences (e.g., personality traits). i. “Biopsychosocial” framework: “bio” = neurobiological and psychophysiological factors; “psycho” = cognitive and emotional factors; “social” = social, cultural, and interpersonal factors). ii. Must integrate psychological science research from peer-reviewed journals 2. Diagnosis (30 points) a. (15 pts) Provides correct mental health diagnosis/diagnoses. b. (15 pts) Provides rationale for diagnosis/diagnoses. i. Identifies at least 2 differential diagnoses – which other disorders did you consider but eventually ruled out? Why? 3. Treatment plan (30 points) a. (25 pts) Describes an evidence-based treatment plan, including citing peer- reviewed journal article(s) as empirical support. Should include both medication recommendations and psychotherapy. Information for psychotherapy should include the therapeutic orientation (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy), treatment duration and frequency (e.g., once per week for 45 minutes), treatment setting (e.g., outpatient), and examples of interventions (e.g., systematic desensitization). b. (5 pts) Provides likely effectiveness of treatment plan based on existing evidence, including citing peer-reviewed journal article(s) as empirical support. 4. Quality of writing (15 points) a. (3 pts) Logical flow of ideas – order and content of paragraphs provide a coherent narrative. b. (3 pts) Proper spelling, grammar, and syntax. c. (3 pts) Proper format: APA-style References section. d. (3 pts) Proper citation of all in-text references to external information. e. (3 pts) No quotes or heavy paraphrasing case: VIGNETTE 2 Overview: Sora is a 27-year-old Asian, married, bisexual female. She lives in Baltimore with her partner and is pregnant with their first child. She is employed as data scientist at Under Armour. She is seeking treatment for “anxiety.” Presenting concerns and mental health history: For as long as Sora can remember, she has been described as a “worrier” which she attributes to being a “perfectionist.” Her parents reported that as the eldest child of three, Sora always tried lead by example and was a “rule follower.” Sora is high in conscientiousness and works diligently to act in accordance with her values. Sora’s partner reported that Sora has always been “very concerned about doing the right thing.” They described that most of the time, this mindset is helpful—Sora is thoughtful in making decisions, apologetic when she is wrong, and empathetically tries to take other people’s perspectives. However, her partner reported that over the past 7 months—soon after she learned she was pregnant—Sora has been excessively concerned about doing the right thing. With nationwide stress of the upcoming US presidential election, Sora has been frequently worrying about having bad social interactions because she wants to be 100% certain that she says the “correct” things to other people. Her primary fear during these social interactions is that she will share an opinion that is immoral. She worries that if she does say or do something immoral, something bad will happen (likely to a loved one). To prevent this from happening, Sora reviews her morals before social interactions to ensure she has complete clarity about them, and after social interactions, she replays what she said to determine if she upheld her moral integrity. Her partner reported that recently, Sora has been texting them summaries of her conversations and checking with them to see if she said the right things. Physical health history: Unremarkable. Social history: Sora was born in New York City. She moved to Baltimore when she was 18 years old to attend Johns Hopkins University and stayed there after graduation to work at Under Armour. She describes herself as an “introvert” and generally prefers to keep to herself rather than socialize. She maintained a small group of close friends throughout college; most left Baltimore after graduation, but one friend lives nearby, and Sora sees her sporadically. Sora and her partner began dating during her sophomore year of college and married 3 years ago. Family mental health history: Father: none Mother: anxiety Paternal grandmother: anxiety; schizophrenia Paternal uncle: schizophrenia Clinician’s observations during initial intake assessment: Sora arrived 30 minutes early for her appointment. She was neatly dressed. She was oriented to time and place. She maintained appropriate eye contact. She appeared nervous, as evidenced by frequent fidgeting. At times, she appeared distracted and unfocused, which required questions to be repeated. She appeared honest and forthcoming in her answers, though frequently checked to see if she answered the question correctly and apologized if she did not.