Based On What You Have Discussed With Your Teammates, Write A Paper About What You Can Expect To Understand From A Level English Language Essay Help

Based on what you have discussed with your teammates, write a paper about what you can expect to understand from learning about Buddhism in Medieval Japan. So, you now know that Buddhism changed when it spread to Japan, right? What do you think caused these changes? Maybe you can get an insight into Japanese society if you analyze closely how Buddhism changed in Japan. But then you also know that our understanding of Japanese Buddhism changed over the last three decades or so. What do you think caused these changes? By closely analyzing how our understanding of how Buddhism changed in Japan changed, maybe you can get an insight into…what? Length: 3-5 pages Format: Double space; 12 point font; 1 inch margins all around ! Include the two tables you made with your teammates in the appendix (meaning, they should be outside of the 3-5 pages). ! Your main source should be A Cultural History of Japanese Buddhism by Deal and Ruppert. You can supplement it with other sources but you don’t have to. Suggested Outline: Introduction Overview of Japanese Buddhism in the Medieval Period Overview of the recent changes in the scholarship Your interpretation about the background of the scholarship change Conclusion–what you can expect to understand from learning about Buddhism in Medieval Japan

[supanova_question]

Please write an essay contrasting the basic assumptions underlying the Classical macroeconomic model and the Keynesian macroeconomic model, and describe Essay essay help free

Please write an essay contrasting the basic assumptions underlying the Classical macroeconomic model and the Keynesian macroeconomic model, and describe each of them in terms of whether they are dynamic/static, stable. unstable, wholistic/narrow, etc. Specifically, somewhere in your essay, briefly address the following questions: 1. Which of the two models is better “grounded”? 2. Which is more useful for explaining how an economy works? 3. How might the dialectic approach contribute to improving our understanding of the macroeconomy?

[supanova_question]

Overview: SEE-I stands for State, Elaborate, Explain, and Illustrate. SEE-I is an excellent tool to help develop the critical essay help: essay help

Overview:
SEE-I stands for State, Elaborate, Explain, and Illustrate. SEE-I is an excellent tool to help develop the critical thinking standard of clarity. Using SEE-I allows the thinker to communicate a concept more clearly by progressively elaborating on the definition. First, you would state the concept. Then, you would elaborate on the concept in as much detail as necessary. Then, you provide an example of the concept. Finally, you share an illustration. An illustration can be a simile, metaphor, or picture. But, an illustration is not an example. This paragraph is an example of using the SEE-I technique to describe and define SEE-I. Using the SEE-I technique to clarify a thought is like putting on a pair of glasses to see the world in explicit detail.

Assignment:
Dr. Paul described several vital standards of thought, describing each in detail. For example, he defined the standard of relevance and discussed the ability to discern relevance in some detail. He exemplified his point by describing how moral code may not be relevant to answer legal questions and how the periodic table of elements may not be relevant to answer ethical questions. Picture a sailor dying of thirst, adrift in an ocean. Drinking water is critical; all that seawater is not relevant to the sailor’s survival.

View Parts 1 and 2 of Dr. Richard Paul: On the Standards of Thought (The Foundation for Critical Thinking, 2008), and then respond to the following prompts.

Discussion Prompts:
-State: In your own words, describe one of the standards of thought
-Elaborate: Elaborate on your definition
-Exemplify: Provide an example within a leadership context
-Illustrate: Provide an illustration (e.g., metaphor, simile, analogy) for your chosen standard

[supanova_question]

In this assignment you will demonstrate your ability to draw conclusions by applying your logic and reasoning to answering online essay help

In this assignment you will demonstrate your ability to draw conclusions by applying your logic and reasoning to answering the critical thinking questions below. Your answers must be a minimum of 400 words each. Upload a word document for scoring.

1. How do informal characteristics of representatives in the US House and US Senate present a distinct advantage in candidates for office? For example, leadership is important since they have to be able to carry on and initiate their own ideas. Being relatively independent from the governor is also key when it comes to being in office. Overall, displaying leadership, independence, and being able to balance work are characteristics that can represent a distinct advantage in candidates running for office.

2. Are there wider social realities that make it more difficult for women and minorities to gain office? For example, the overall area of politics is male-dominated and to be more exact, white-male-dominated. How can this make women and minorities feel less confident to gain office due to their difference/lack of education, cultural background, and overall lack of confidence can factor into making women and minorities gain office more difficult. Do you see this as a non-issue? If so, why?

[supanova_question]

for this assignment. 1) on the table calculate the % of error, average error, and standard deviation. the equations cheap essay help: cheap essay help

for this assignment.
1) on the table calculate the % of error, average error, and standard deviation. the equations and the values are all given on the report.
1) make sure you answer question number 7 which is, “From the pipetting and data table that you filled in earlier: This experiment should indicate the accuracy of your pipette. Analyze your data for the high and low volume for each pipette. Does the standard deviation indicate variation in the data? If yes, do you believe that this variation is due to the accuracy of the micropipette or due to poor technique? Explain your answer by using the data to support your conclusion.”

3) answer the lab questions on the last page 1 through 6.

please let me know if you have any additional questions, thanks!

[supanova_question]

INDIGENOUS COURSE https://www.nfb.ca/film/kanehsatake_270_years_of_resistance/ Refer to the above link of a video, it is what you will write the paper on Students will write a 1500-word review of college essay help near me: college essay help near me

nfb.ca/film/kanehsatake_270_years_of_resistance/
Refer to the above link of a video, it is what you will write the paper on
Students will write a 1500-word review of Alanis Obomsawin’s Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance. The goal of the assignment is to use course readings and concepts discussed in lecture and class activities to analyze how the film help us understand the 1990 Oka “crisis” and issues regarding unresolved land claims. Essays must have a central thesis and will be assessed on how well students engage with the film to demonstrate their thesis.
The goal of the assignment is to demonstrate your ability to think critically about Indigenous-settler relations and to evaluate the contribution of the film. What is unique about the film’s contribution?
Format: Your paper should be in essay style, double-spaced, 12-point font, with page numbers and 1-inch margins.
Citations: All sources used in your essay must be properly cited using one of the major citation styles (APA, Chicago, MLA).
Grading:
You will be graded on:
your demonstrated understanding of the course content;
your ability to reflect critically and engage with the film and its arguments/questions/problems;
the clarity of your argument; the originality of your ideas; and the quality and effectiveness of your writing.
A strong essay:
has a clearly defined introduction (should not exceed one paragraph) that introduces the topic and states the thesis of the paper, e.g. “This paper argues…”/“I argue…” (Note: You don’t have to use this exact phrasing, but it can help ensure you have a thesis statement.)
provides a summary/overview of the film (should not exceed 1-2 paragraphs)
has a logical structure, i.e. each paragraph has a topic sentence and develops one point that supports the paper’s thesis
analyzes specific examples from the book to support each point
contains no spelling or grammatical errors
contains proper citations
What do I look for in papers?            
Here is a very rough guideline of what I look for in papers. Here are the basics; serious questions that everyone should be asking themselves about their work.
THESIS: Is there ONE main/central argument in the paper that can be traced throughout? Does it fulfill the assignment?  Is the thesis/argument clearly stated near the beginning of the paper in a clearly defined introductory paragraph? It is strong, interesting, complex and well stated? Is it argued throughout the entire paper?
STRUCTURE: Is the paper clearly organized around demonstrating and explaining the thesis/argument? Is it easy to understand the main point of each paragraph in relation to the thesis? Does the order of the overall argument make sense, and is it easy to follow?
EVIDENCE *AND* ANALYSIS!: Does the paper offer supporting evidence for each of its main points backing up the thesis? Does the evidence suggest the writer’s knowledge of the subject matter and key terms, themes, and issues of the material?  Has the paper overlooked any obvious or important pieces of evidence?  Is there enough analysis of evidence to back up your main points relating to the thesis? Is the evidence properly attributed, and is the bibliographic information correct?
STYLE: Is the style appropriate for its audience and in keeping with the main objectives of the assignment guidelines? Is the paper concise and to the point? Are sentences clear and grammatically correct? Are there spelling or proofreading errors?
As you are writing, remember to look over what I am looking for…ask yourself the questions. These are the same questions I will ask of your paper as I am marking.
2.            Writing hints.
Here is a general suggested way of making sure that you at least start your critical review in the right direction.
At the very basic level, you should think about using a four part structure for writing…at least to start. Let’s see how this works in regards to writing the introduction to your paper for review #2.
Introduction
Part I. In your first sentence, introduce your reader to the topic that your essay will be looking at: This essay will critically examine ___.  This is just an example to get you going. (1 Sentence)
Part II. (2 sentences) Introduce your reader to the subject and some of the big ideas you think are important. Briefly talk about Indigenous-settler relations at this point in history and what the film is about.
Part III. Your own thesis statement (one sentence) *This is Extremely important*              
For this assignment your thesis statement will be making an argument about the strengths and/or weakness of the film based on your own analysis. For example: “I argue/ This paper will argue” (whatever you are comfortable with) that  ______.” A thesis statement makes a point, an argument. Your essay will set out to prove your argument with evidence and analysis.
Part IV. Now that you have given your reader a thesis statement in the form of an argument, you need to tell them how you will demonstrate this argument throughout your paper. To help your reader know where you are going, think about providing a very short road map sentence (1 sentence).  For example: “To demonstrate my argument, I will critically analyze: X, Y, and Z.
X, Y, and Z are your major points that will back up your argument.  In fact, each factor (X,Y, and Z) become your evidence you will analyze in your body paragraphs to support your central thesis statement.
Body paragraphs
After having 1 paragraph summarizing the book, then you will need to organize a number of body paragraphs to support your X, Y, and Z points, analyzing the material to support your overall argument.
Instead of page numbers, for evidence you will use quotes as well as time stamps to show your reader where you drawing material from i.e. “………….quote…………” (17:65).
Conclusion:
Your analysis should then lead into your conclusion.
Your conclusion will restate your thesis statement and remind your reader how your analysis of the evidence provided demonstrated it.

[supanova_question]

The placement of the industrial hygiene and safety functions in an organization’s structure can greatly impact how successful the college essay help online

The placement of the industrial hygiene and safety functions in an organization’s structure can greatly impact how successful the programs will be. Some organizations place health and safety programs under the human resources department. Other organizations place these programs under the plant manager or the production manager. If you were a safety officer for an organization, where would you place health and safety programs in the organizational structure? Explain why you believe this placement would work best for your organization.

[supanova_question]

select a movie that you think is worthy of study, watch it (more than once), and write a comprehensive review/ essay help site:edu: essay help site:edu

select a movie that you think is worthy of study, watch it (more than once), and write a comprehensive review/ analysis of that movie. Note that reviews should include summary (but NO SPOILERS), and an analysis of the various components of the movie: script, acting, direction, soundtrack etc. The over all claim should be how good or bad the movie is, then the analysis justifies that claim. You can be as creative here as you want, and include visual images, a rating system, etc. Have fun! 750 words

[supanova_question]

Reply to each of the three discussion in about a paragraph as if you are having a conversation with essay help site:edu

Reply to each of the three discussion in about a paragraph as if you are having a conversation with the author of the original post. You can add to their post. Each post requires one response, three in total. Each one with one source can use the same source from original post if new material is added from it.

[supanova_question]